分析 本文屬于說明文閱讀,作者通過這篇文章向我們介紹了小的積極的選擇與成功之間的關(guān)系,我們的生活中到處都有一些很小的選擇,而這些選擇會使我們的生活有很大的不同,并且會對我們產(chǎn)生持久的影響.
解答 54.B 細(xì)節(jié)理解題,根據(jù)第一段Sometimes it's hard to see how small choices can change your life.But when put together over time,the little things can make the biggest difference.可知有時候一些很小的選擇都能改變你的生活,因此前面的"turns on"指的是生活是取決于一些小的事情,故選B.
55.D 推理判斷題,根據(jù)第二段Lots of teens don't realize how the little choices in their lives can have lasting effects.可知很多青少年不知道他們生活中的一些很小的選擇會產(chǎn)生持久的影響,他們還沒有意識到一些小的選擇的重要性,故選D.
56.C 主旨大意題,通讀全文可知作者在這篇文章中主要向我們介紹了小的積極的選擇與成功之間的關(guān)系,故選C.
點(diǎn)評 考查學(xué)生的細(xì)節(jié)理解和推理判斷能力.做細(xì)節(jié)理解題時一定要找到文章中的原句,和題干進(jìn)行比較,再做出正確選擇.在做推理判斷題時不要以個人的主觀想象代替文章的事實(shí),要根據(jù)文章事實(shí)進(jìn)行合乎邏輯的推理判斷.
年級 | 高中課程 | 年級 | 初中課程 |
高一 | 高一免費(fèi)課程推薦! | 初一 | 初一免費(fèi)課程推薦! |
高二 | 高二免費(fèi)課程推薦! | 初二 | 初二免費(fèi)課程推薦! |
高三 | 高三免費(fèi)課程推薦! | 初三 | 初三免費(fèi)課程推薦! |
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:選擇題
A. | expensive | B. | ordinary | C. | fragile | D. | precious |
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:2017屆天津市河北區(qū)高三總復(fù)習(xí)質(zhì)量檢測(二)英語試卷(解析版) 題型:單項(xiàng)填空
—Did you enjoy the party?
--Yes,we___by our hosts.
A.were treated B.would be treated.
C.treated D.had treated
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:2016-2017學(xué)年山西省晉中市名校高二下學(xué)期期中聯(lián)考英語試卷(解析版) 題型:閱讀理解
I was the oldest of five children back in the 60’s.We lived in a nice little three-bedroom bungalow(平房)in Michigan.Mom and Dad worked so hard, yet always found the time to spend with us.The only place they could take five active children to was the drive-in(汽車影院)movies!
We always looked forward to going to the drive-in! Mom would fill a big bag with home-made popcorn.On the way there, Dad would make a special stop at the penny candy store, where we were all allowed to fill a little brown bag with all kinds of penny candy.We were so excited, as we carried our treasures back to the car, knowing we couldn’t eat it until the car-toon began.
We would get there early, so that we could play on the playground, right under the big screen.As soon as it started to get dark, the screen lit up, and we would race bake to the car to get our candy.
There were always two cartoons playing before the movie , like Felix the Cat, The Coyote, and Tom and Jerry. But what was just as exciting was the ticking clock advertisement for the refreshment stand, with dancing hot dogs, candy and ice cream.That came on right before the movie.It was all that five kids could hope for, and by then, stay awake for.
We would get home around 2 am, pretty late for us.Mom helped us drag ourselves and our pillows to our beds and dad carried in the little ones.
I was disappointed the day they closed the last drive-in in our town.It will always hold special memories for us—those days of penny candy.
1.What could the author eat when he watched the cartoons and movies?
A. Hot dogs B. Ice cream.
C. Hamburgers. D. Popcorn and candy.
2.What does the underlined phrase “our treasures” in the second paragraph refer to?
A. Mom and dad. B. The penny candy.
C. Favorite cartoons. D. Homemade popcorn.
3.What was the last show before the movie?
A. Felix the Cat. B. Tom and Jerry.
C. The dancing hot dogs. D. The ticking clock advertisement.
4.What do we know about the author?
A. He had a boring childhood. B. He had four younger brothers.
C. He missed the drive-in very much. D. He didn’t like watching the movies at all.
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:2017屆湖南省衡陽市高三實(shí)驗(yàn)班第一次模擬考試英語試卷(解析版) 題型:閱讀理解
You’ve probably heard such reports. The number of college students majoring in the humanities (人文學(xué)科) is decreasing quickly. The news has caused a flood of high-minded essays criticizing the development as a symbol of American decline.
The bright side is this: The destruction of the humanities by the humanities is, finally, coming to an end. No more will literature, as part of an academic curriculum, put out the light of literature. No longer will the reading of, say, “King Lear” or D.H. Lawrence’s “Women in Love” result in the annoying stuff of multiple-choice quizzes, exam essays and homework assignments.
The discouraging fact is that for every college professor who made Shakespeare or Lawrence come alive for the lucky few, there were countless others who made the reading of literary masterpieces seem like two hours in the dentist’s chair.
The remarkably insignificant fact that, a half-century ago, 14% of the undergraduate population majored in the humanities (mostly in literature, but also in art, philosophy, history, classics and religion) as opposed to 7% today has given rise to serious reflections on the nature and purpose of an education in the liberal arts.
Such reflections always come to the same conclusion: We are told that the lack of a formal education, mostly in literature, leads to numerous harmful personal conditions, such as the inability to think critically, to write clearly, to be curious about other people and places, to engage with great literature after graduation, to recognize truth, beauty and goodness.
These serious anxieties are grand, admirably virtuous and virtuously admirable. They are also a mere fantasy.
The college teaching of literature is a relatively recent phenomenon. Literature did not even become part of the university curriculum until the end of the 19th century. Before that, what came to be called the humanities consisted of learning Greek and Latin, while the Bible was studied in church as the necessary other half of a full education. No one ever thought of teaching novels, stories, poems or plays in a formal course of study. They were part of the leisure of everyday life.
It was only after World War II that the study of literature as a type of wisdom, relevant to actual, contemporary life, put down widespread institutional roots. Soldiers returning home in 1945 longed to make sense of their lives after what they had witnessed and survived. The abundant economy afforded them the opportunity and the time to do so. Majoring in English hit its peak, yet it was this very popularity of literature in the university that spelled its doom, as the academicization of literary art was accelerated.
Literature changed my life long before I began to study it in college. Books took me far from myself into experiences that had nothing to do with my life, yet spoke to my life. But once in the college classroom, this precious, alternate life inside me got thrown back into that dimension of my existence that bored me. Homer, Chekhov and Yeats were reduced to right and wrong answers, clear-cut themes and clever interpretations. If there is anything to worry about, it should be the disappearance of what used to be an important part of every high-school education: the literature survey course, where books were not academically taught but thoroughly introduced—an experience unaffected by stupid commentary and useless testing.
The literary classics are places of quiet, useless stillness in a world that despises (鄙視) any activity that is not profitable or productive. Literature is too sacred to be taught. It needs only to be read.
Soon, if all goes well and literature at last disappears from the undergraduate curriculum—my fingers are crossed—increasing numbers of people will be able to say that reading the literary masterworks of the past outside the college classroom, simply in the course of living, was, in fact, their college classroom.
1.The author mentions “two hours in the dentist’s chair” in Paragraph 3 to indicate that _______.
A. the average literature class in college is two hours long
B. reading literary works is made unbearable by professors
C. it actually does not take long to read the classics of literature
D. college students don’t spend much time on literary masterworks
2.The sharp drop in the number of majors in the humanities _______.
A. has given rise to quite a shock in the intellectual world
B. promises the remarkable destruction of the humanities
C. shows more people read literature outside the classroom
D. has caused the author to reflect on the nature of literary creation
3.Which of the following opinions may the author hold?
A. The disappearance of literature should be strongly applauded.
B. Literature teaching can improve our critical thinking ability.
C. Reading literature doesn’t require specialized knowledge and skills.
D. Literature should be taught through analyzing different writing styles.
4.What is the author’s purpose in writing the passage?
A. To urge college students to read more literary classics.
B. To introduce the present situation of literature teaching.
C. To voice his opinion on the shrinkage of literature teaching.
D. To show his serious concern for college literature teaching.
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:選擇題
A. | has sold | B. | had sold | C. | sold | D. | would have sold |
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:填空題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:選擇題
A. | You must be tired. | |
B. | I enjoyed it very much. | |
C. | You must have spent all day cooking. | |
D. | I have never had it before. |
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:選擇題
A. | familiar | B. | popular | C. | similar | D. | interested |
查看答案和解析>>
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 涉企侵權(quán)舉報專區(qū)
違法和不良信息舉報電話:027-86699610 舉報郵箱:58377363@163.com