Question

Two friends have an argument that breaks up their friendship forever, even though neither one can remember how the whole thing got started. Such sad events happen over and over in high schools across the country. In fact, according to an official report on youth violence, "In our country today, the greatest threat to the lives of children and adolescents is not disease or starvation or abandonment, but the terrible reality of violence". Given that this is the case, why aren't students taught to manage conflict the way they are taught to solve math problems, drive ears, or stay physically fit?
First of all, students need to realize that conflict is unavoidable. A report on violence among middle school and high school students indicates that most violent incidents between students begin with a relatively minor insult (侮辱). For example, a fight could start over the fact that one student eats a peanut butter sandwich each lunchtime. Laughter over the sandwich can lead to insults, which in turn can lead to violence. The problem isn't in the sandwich, but in the way students deal with the conflict.
Once students recognize that conflict is unavoidable, they can practice the golden rule of conflict resolution (解決) : stay calm. Once the student feels calmer, he or she should choose words that will calm the other person down as well Rude words, name-calling, and accusations only add fuel to the emotional fire. On the other hand, soft words spoken at a normal sound level can put out the fire before it explodes out of control.
After both sides have calmed down, they can use another key strategy (策略) for conflict resolution : listening. Listening allows the two sides to understand each other. One person should describe his or her side, and the other person should listen without interrupting. Afterward, the listener can ask non-threatening questions to clarify the speaker's position. Then the two people should change roles.
Finally, students need to consider what they are hearing. This doesn't mean trying to figure out what's wrong with the other person. It means understanding what the real issue is and what both sides are trying to accomplish. For example, a shouting match over a peanut butter sandwich might happen because one person thinks the other person is unwilling to try new things. Students need to ask themselves questions such as these: How did this start? What do I really want? What am I afraid of? As the issue becomes clearer, the conflict often simply becomes smaller. Even if it doesn't, careful thought helps both sides figure out a mutual solution.
There will always be conflict in schools, but that doesn't mean there needs to be violence. After students in Atlanta started a conflict resolution program, according to Educators for Social Responsibility, "64 percent of the teachers reported less physical violence in the classroom; 75 percent of the teachers reported an increase in student co-operation; and 92 percent of the students felt better about themselves'. Learning to resolve conflicts can help students deal with friends, teachers, parents, bosses, and coworkers. In that way, conflict resolution is a basic life skill that should be taught in schools across the country

1. 1.
   From Paragraph 2 we can learn that_______
   1. A.
      violence is more likely to occur at lunchtime
   2. B.
      a small conflict can lead to violence
   3. C.
      students tend to lose their temper easily
   4. D.
      the eating habit of a student is often the cause of a fight
2. 2.
   Why do students need to ask themselves the questions stated in Paragraph 5?
   1. A.
      To find out who is to blame
   2. B.
      To get ready to try new things
   3. C.
      To make clear what the real issue is
   4. D.
      To figure out how to stop the shouting match
3. 3.
   After the conflict resolution program was started in Atlanta, it was found that______
   1. A.
      there was a decrease in classroom violence
   2. B.
      there was less student cooperation in the classroom
   3. C.
      more teachers felt better about themselves in schools
   4. D.
      the teacher-student relationship greatly improved
4. 4.
   The writer's purpose for writing this article is to_______
   1. A.
      complain about problems in school education
   2. B.
      teach students different strategies for school life
   3. C.
      favor teaching conflict management in schools
   4. D.
      inform teachers of the latest studies on school violence

Answer 1

BCAC
試題分析：1.B 細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)第二段2,3行most violent incidents between students begin with a relatively minor insult (侮辱).說明細(xì)小的沖突會(huì)引起暴力，故B正確。
2.C 細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)第五段2,3行It means understanding what the real issue is and what both sides are trying to accomplish.說明這樣做是為了搞清楚真正的問題在哪里，故C正確。
3.A 細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)最后一段3,4,5行"64 percent of the teachers reported less physical violence in the classroom; 75 percent of the teachers reported an increase in student co-operation; and 92 percent of the students felt better about themselves'.說明教室里的暴力現(xiàn)象在變少，A正確。
4.C 主旨大意題。根據(jù)文章最后三行Learning to resolve conflicts can help students deal with friends, teachers, parents, bosses, and coworkers. In that way, conflict resolution is a basic life skill that should be taught in schools across the country.說明了教育學(xué)生如何處理這些小矛盾對(duì)學(xué)生的重要作用，是支持在學(xué)校中教育學(xué)生如何處理沖突，故C正確。
考點(diǎn)：考查教育類短文閱讀
點(diǎn)評(píng)：文章介紹了在學(xué)校中一些小矛盾會(huì)給學(xué)生帶來很多的問題，故要對(duì)學(xué)生處理這種沖突的技能要進(jìn)行教育。本文要求考生抓每段的段落大意和文章的主旨大意如66題的考查就十分到位，另外細(xì)節(jié)題的考查仍然是重點(diǎn)。