A nine year old schoolgirl single handedly cooks up a science fair experiment that ends up debunking(揭穿……的真相)a widely practiced medical treatment.Emily Rosa's target was a practice known as therapeutic(治療的)touch(TT for short), whose advocates manipulate patients'“energy field”to make them feel better and even, say some, to cure them of various ills.Yet Emily's test shows that these energy fields can't be detected, even by trained TT practitioners(行醫(yī)者).Obviously mindful of the publicity value of the situation, Journal editor George Lundberg appeared on TV to declare,“Age doesn't matter.It's good science that matters, and this is good science.”

  Emily's mother Linda Rosa, a registered nurse, has been campaigning against TT for nearly a decade.Linda first thought about TT in the late '80s, when she learned it was on the approved list for continuing nursing education in Colorado.Its 100,000 trained practitioners(48,000 in the U.S.)don't even touch their patients.Instead, they waved their hands a few inches from the patient's body, pushing energy fields around until they’re in“balance.”TT advocates say these manipulations can help heal wounds, relieve Pain and reduce fever.The claims are taken seriously enough that TT therapists are frequently hired by leading hospitals, at up to $ 70 an hour, to smooth patients' energy, sometimes during surgery.Yet Rosa could not find any evidence that it works.To provide such proof, TT therapists would have to sit down for independent testing-something they haven't been eager to do, even though James Randi has offered more than $1 million to anyone who can demonstrate the existence of a human energy field.(He's had one taker so far.She failed.)A skeptic might conclude that TT practitioners are afraid to lay their beliefs on the line.But who could turn down an innocent fourth grader?Says Emily:“I think they didn't take me very seriously because I'm a kid.”

  The experiment was straight forward:21 TT therapists stuck their hands, palms up, through a screen.Emily held her own hand over one of theirs left or right and the practitioners had to say which hand it was.When the results were recorded, they'd done no better than they would have by simply guessing.If there was an energy field, they couldn't feel it.

(1)

Which of the following is evidence that TT is widely practiced?

[  ]

A.

TT has been in existence for decades.

B.

Many patients were cured by therapeutic touch.

C.

TT therapists are often employed by leading hospitals.

D.

More than 100,000 people are undergoing TT treatment.

(2)

Very few TT practitioners responded to the $1 million offer because ________.

[  ]

A.

they didn't take the offer seriously

B.

they didn't want to risk their career

C.

they were unwilling to reveal their secret

D.

they thought it was not in line with their practice

(3)

The purpose of Emily Rosa's experiment was ________.

[  ]

A.

to see why TT could work the way it did

B.

to find out how TT cured patients' illnesses

C.

to test whether she could sense the human energy field

D.

to test whether a human energy field really existed

(4)

Why did some TT practitioners agree to be the subjects of Emil's experiment?

[  ]

A.

It involved nothing more than mere guessing.

B.

They thought it was going to be a lot of fun.

C.

It was more straightforward than other experiments.

D.

They sensed no harm in a little girl's experiment.

答案:1.C;2.C;3.D;4.D;
解析:

(1)

根據(jù)第2段The claims are taken seriously enough that TT therapists are frequently hired by leading hospitals.(這種宣揚(yáng)很受重視,以致TT行醫(yī)者經(jīng)常受雇于大的醫(yī)院……)選項(xiàng)A)文章中沒有提及,選項(xiàng)B)敘述不準(zhǔn)確,文中只是說,據(jù)稱這種方法能使人病情好轉(zhuǎn),甚至說有的能治療各種疾病“。選項(xiàng)D)與文章內(nèi)容不符,文章說,川萬(wàn)受過培訓(xùn)的TT行醫(yī)者甚至不接觸病人身體……。故A),B),D)均不是答案。

(2)

根據(jù)文章第3段第2句:為了提供這樣一個(gè)證明(證明人有“能場(chǎng)”'),TT行醫(yī)者不得不坐下接受獨(dú)立的測(cè)試-這是他們一直都不愿意做的事情,即使詹姆斯·蘭迪為能演示人存在“能場(chǎng)”的人提供一百多萬(wàn)美元的獎(jiǎng)金。(To provide such proof, TT therapists would have to sit down for independent testing something they haven'tbeen eager to do, even though James Landi has offered more than $ 1 million to anyone who can demonstrate the existence of a human energy field.)

(3)

根據(jù)文章第1段我們知道,TT行醫(yī)者所宣揚(yáng)的就是通過調(diào)節(jié)病人的“能場(chǎng)”來(lái)治病(whose advocates manipulate patient's“energy field”to make them feel better and even, say some, to cure them of various ills)。在第2段中,又提到“運(yùn)用這種手法可以推動(dòng)能場(chǎng)轉(zhuǎn)動(dòng)直到平衡(…pushing energy fieds around until they're in“balance”)“而愛米麗·瑞莎的實(shí)驗(yàn)就是證明是否能場(chǎng)真的存在。特別文章最后一句If there was an energy field, they couldn't feel it.(如果有一個(gè)能場(chǎng)的話,他們也感覺不到。)選項(xiàng)C)說是測(cè)試她能否感覺到能場(chǎng),如果是這樣的話,前提是存在一個(gè)能場(chǎng),這當(dāng)然是錯(cuò)誤的。A),B)兩個(gè)選項(xiàng)也是錯(cuò)誤的。

(4)

根據(jù)文章第3段從第2句到段末這部分:A skeptic might conclude that TT practitioners are afraid to lay their beliefs on the line.But who would turn down an innocent, fourth grader?Says Emily:“I think they didn't take me very seriously because I'm a kid”.(懷疑的人或許會(huì)因?yàn)門T行醫(yī)者害怕使他們自己處于被揭露的危險(xiǎn)中,但誰(shuí)能拒絕一個(gè)天真的四年級(jí)的小學(xué)生呢?愛米麗說,“我想他們不會(huì)太把我當(dāng)回事,因?yàn)槲沂莻(gè)小孩子。)


練習(xí)冊(cè)系列答案
相關(guān)習(xí)題

科目:高中英語(yǔ) 來(lái)源:安徽省省城名校2012屆高三第三次聯(lián)考試題英語(yǔ)試題 題型:050

閱讀理解

  By adopting a few simple techniques, parents who read to their children can greatly increase their children's language development.It is surprising but true.How parents talk to their children makes a big difference in the children's language development.If a parent encourages the child to actively respond to what the parent is reading, the child's language skills increase.

  A study was done with 30 three-y ear-old children and their parents.Half of the children participated in the experimental study; the other half acted as the control group.In the experimental group, me parents were given a two-hour [raining session in which they were taught to ask open-ended questions rather man yes-or-no questions.For example, the parent should ask, "What is the doggie doing?" rather than "Is the doggie inning away?" The parents in the experimental group were also instructed in how to help children find answers, how to suggest alternative possibilities and how to praise correct answers.

  At the beginning of the study, the children did not differ in measures of language development, but at the end of one month, the children in the experimental group showed 5.5 months ahead of the control group on a test of verbal expression and vocabulary.Nine months later, the children in me experimental group still showed an advance of 6 months over the children in the control group.

(1)

What can we infer from the passage?

[  ]

A.

Children who talk a lot are more intelligent.

B.

Parents who listen to their children can teach them more.

C.

Active children should read more and be given more attention.

D.

Language ability can easily be developed with proper methods.

(2)

The underlined word "it" in line 2 refers to ________.

[  ]

A.

Parents increasing children's language development.

B.

Reading techniques being simple.

C.

Parents reading to children.

D.

Children's intelligence development.

(3)

According to the author, which of the following questions is the best type to ask children about?

[  ]

A.

Do you see the elephant?

B.

Is the elephant in the cage?

C.

What animals do you like?

D.

shall we go to the zoo?

(4)

What conclusion can we draw from the passage?

[  ]

A.

parents should be trained to read to their children

B.

the more children read, die more intelligent they will become

C.

children's language skills increase when they are required to respond actively

D.

children who read actively seem six months older

查看答案和解析>>

同步練習(xí)冊(cè)答案