Question

【題目】根據(jù)短文內(nèi)容，選擇最佳答案。
Forget Cyclists, Pedestrians are Real Danger
We are having a debate about this topic. Here are some letters from our readers.
■ Yes, many cyclists behave dangerously. Many drivers are disrespectful of cyclists But pedestrians are probably the worse offenders.
People of all ages happily walk along the pavement with eyes and hands glued to the mobile phone, quite unaware of what is going on around them. They may even do the same thing while crossing a road at a pedestrian crossing or elsewhere. The rest of us have to evade (避讓) them or just stand still to wait for the unavoidable collision.
The real problem is that some pedestrians seem to be, at least for the moment, in worlds of their own that are, to them, much more important than the welfare of others.
——Michael Horan
■ I loved the letter from Bob Brooks about cyclists (Viewpoints, May 29). I am afraid they seem to think they own the roads.
I was walking across Altrincharn Road one morning when a cyclist went round me and on being asked what he was doing he shouted at me.
The government built a cycle lane on the road but it is hardly used.
The police do nothing. What a laugh they are!
The cyclists should all have to be made to use the cycle lanes and wear helmets, fluorescent (發(fā)熒光的)jacket and tights at night and in the morning. They should pay some sort of tax and be fined for not wearing them.
——Carol Harvey
■ Cyclists jump on and off pavements (which are meant for pedestrians), ride at speed along the pavements, and think they have a special right to go through traffic lights when they are on red.
I was almost knocked down recently by a cyclist riding on the pavement when there was a cycle lane right next to him.
Other road users, including horse riders, manage to obey the rules so why not cyclists?
It's about time they had to be registered and insured, so when they do hit a pedestrian or a vehicle, or cause an accident, at least they can be traced and there might be an opportunity to claim.
——JML
Write to Viewpoints of the newspaper.
（1）Michael Horan wrote the letter mainly to show that .
A.drivers should be polite to cyclists
B.road accidents can actually be avoided
C.some pedestrians are a threat to road safety
D.walking while using phones hum one's eyes
（2）Carol Harvey suggests that cyclists should .
A.be provided with enough roads
B.be asked to ride on their own lanes
C.be made to pay less tax for cycling
D.be fined for laughing at policemen
（3）The underline word “they” in the third letter refers to .
A.accidents
B.vehicles
C.pedestrians
D.cyclists
（4）The three letters present viewpoints on .
A.real sources of road danger
B.ways to improve road facilities
C.measures to punish road offences
D.increased awareness of road rules

Answer 1

【答案】
（1）C
（2）B
（3）D
（4）A
【解析】本文通過三封來(lái)信來(lái)探討一個(gè)問題：騎車人對(duì)馬路安全存在很大威脅。
（1）細(xì)節(jié)理解。由Michael Horan所寫信的內(nèi)容，尤其是“many cyclists behave dangerously. Many drivers are disrespectful of cyclists. But pedestrians are probably the worse offenders”可知，Michael Horan認(rèn)為騎自行車的人和司機(jī)都很危險(xiǎn)。但是，行人可能是更嚴(yán)重的罪犯，他們對(duì)道路安全存在威脅。結(jié)合選項(xiàng)可知，所以答案是C。
（2）細(xì)節(jié)理解。由Carol Harvey所寫的信中的“The cyclists should all have to be made to use the cycle lanes and wear helmets”可知，Carol Harvey認(rèn)為騎自行車的人應(yīng)該使用自行車道去騎車，而且要戴著頭盔。所以答案是B。
（3）詞義猜測(cè)。由JML所寫的信中的“Other road users, including horse riders, manage to obey the rules so why not cyclists? It's about time they had to be registered and insured, so when they do hit a pedestrian or a vehicle, or cause an accident, at least they can be treated and there might be an opportunity to claim”可知，JML認(rèn)為，騎自行車的人也應(yīng)該遵守規(guī)定。他們應(yīng)該進(jìn)行登記。當(dāng)他們撞到行人或者車輛，引發(fā)車禍的時(shí)候，他們很快就能被查到。故they指的是騎自行車的人。所以答案是D。
（4）主旨大意。由文章開頭“Forget Cyclists, Pedestrians are Real Danger. We are having a debate about this topic. Here are some letters from our readers.”以及三封信的具體內(nèi)容可知，這篇文章主要探討了誰(shuí)是道路安全的隱患，是騎自行車的人，還是行人？所以答案是A。