Question

7．My dearest son and daughter，
    The story of New Jersey high school student Rachel Canning suing （起訴） her parents for child support and high school education inspired me to write you a little letter．Let me just put this out there：the only way I expect to see you in a court is as a lawyer or a judge．
    There are two things about this case that seem to be disaster．
    First，it's natural for parents and children to argue．I can guarantee that we will disagree．One or both of you will，at some point，scream at the top of your lungs the various ways you hate me．And I won't always li ke you，either．But I will always love you and do everything I can to keep your best interests as my focus，even when I'm so angry．We are family．That means we are as much a part of one another as the flesh，blood and bones in our body．And we all should think about it very deeply instead of breaking that bond．
Second，I'll be honest，no matter how far apart we are on your life choices，your father and I will most certainly pay everything we can for your higher education．But that doesn't mean you deserve it．To be clear，that is a privilege we happily extend （給予） to you-not a right you are born with．And you will have to work hard to earn that privilege．Growing up is hard work．
    If I do my job properly as your mother-and you do yours as my children-you would sooner get a job or two，and find a way to make your dreams come true than go to trial over what you think you have the right to．
 Love always，
  Mom
21．The mother writes this letter because she wants her children toB．
A．be prepared for education
B．learn a lesson from the case
C．take up the legal profession
D．remember Rachel Canning
22．When in disagreement，the mother expects her children not toC．
A．guarantee anything
B．scream out their anger
C．break the family bond
D．forget their best interests
23．The mother thinks of parents'paying for their children's higher education asC．
A．a(chǎn) way in which children realize their dreams
B．a(chǎn) test of whether parents love their children
C．a(chǎn) privilege that children should earn
D．a(chǎn) right that parents are born with．

Answer 1

分析 本文屬于說明文閱讀，作者通過這篇文章主要向我們描述了一位媽媽寫給她孩子的信，信中傳達(dá)給孩子一方面她愛他們，會(huì)盡全力照顧他們；另一方面，孩子的教育是他們的優(yōu)勢(shì)，但是得靠自己的努力掙得，并非理所當(dāng)然．

解答 21．B．推理判斷題．根據(jù)文章第一段"The story of New Jersey high school student Rachel Canning suing （起訴） her parents for child support and high school education inspired me to write you a little letter．"可知媽媽寫信的目的是想讓孩子從此案例中學(xué)到啟示；故選B．
22．C．細(xì)節(jié)理解題．根據(jù)文章第三段第一句"And we all should think about it very deeply instead of breaking that bond．"可知，父母和孩子意見不一致是很正常的，從此段最后一句"we all should think about it very deeply instead of breaking that bond．"可知出現(xiàn)矛盾時(shí)．父母希望孩子不要破壞家庭成員之間的紐帶；故選C．
23．C．推理判斷題．根據(jù)倒數(shù)第二段"To be clear，that is a privilege we happily extend （給予） to you-not a right you are born with．"可看出，這個(gè)媽媽認(rèn)為父母支付孩子的高等教育費(fèi)用是父母樂意給予的榮幸，但是并非生來就有；故選C．

點(diǎn)評(píng) 考察學(xué)生的細(xì)節(jié)理解和推理判斷能力，做細(xì)節(jié)理解題時(shí)一定要找到文章中的原句，和題干進(jìn)行比較，再做出正確的選擇．在做推理判斷題不要以個(gè)人的主觀想象代替文章的事實(shí)，要根據(jù)文章事實(shí)進(jìn)行合乎邏輯的推理判斷．