Did you get a flu shot this year?For the first timethe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the US is recommending that all children aged from 6 months to 18 years receive the flu vaccine.

Vaccines battle diseases caused by bacteria and viruses.A weakened form of the germ (病菌) is introduced into the body.The body makes special substances called antibodies (抗體) to fight the germs.If the actual germs were to attack,the antibodies would fight.Because there are many kinds of flu viruses,scientists must create a new vaccine formula (處方) each year.Researchers must make a prediction.

It is like forecasting the weather.Sometimes they are right on,and sometimes they are off.But even when the vaccine does not closely match circulating flu typesit can make the illness less serious.

“The flu vaccine is not as effective as the polio (小兒麻痹癥) vaccine or the measles vaccine,” says Dr.William Schaffner of Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.“It’s not a great vaccine,but it is in fact quite a good vaccine.”

But a flu vaccine doesn’t work for everyone.There are certain people who should be careful about taking itbecause the vaccine is produced in eggs.Those who are allergic (過敏的) to eggs should not take it.If you have a fever,you should wait until you recover.

Some people are afraid that they might get the flu from the flu shot.Scientists say that it is not possiblebecause the viruses in the flu shot are inactivated.But some minor side effects such as low?grade fever and body ache could occur.If they do,they begin soon after the shot and usually last only one to two days.

Did you knowSmallpox was the first disease people tried to prevent by putting a virus into a healthy person.In 1796,English scientist Edward Jenner placed some infected material under a boy’s skin.

1.The underlined word “vaccine” (in Para.1) refers to________.

Avirus used for fighting against disease

Bantibody to fight the germs

Cformula to fight against disease

Dgerm to be injected into the body

2.By saying “It’s not a great vaccinebut it is in fact quite a good vaccine.” (in Para.4),William Schaffner means the flu vaccine________.

Ais as effective as the polio and the measles vaccines

Bis worse,compared with the polio and the measles vaccines

Cdoes help to make illness less serious

Dis quite good because it works for everyone

3.We can infer from the passage that________.

Athose who are not allergic to eggs can take the flu vaccine

Bnot all the flu vaccines are effective for everyone

Cyou should go to a doctor if you have a fever after taking the flu vaccine

Dit is possible that some people might get? the flu from the flu shot

4.When people take the flu vaccine________.

Athey’ll be allergic to eggs

Btheir bodies will ache for 5 days

Cthey probably have a low fever

Dthey won’t catch a flu ever after

 

【答案】

1.D

2.C

3.B

4.C

【解析】

1.

解析 詞義猜測題。由第二段可知,一種形式受到弱化的病菌被注入體內,人體就會產(chǎn)生抗體。病毒入侵時,抗體就能抗擊病毒,因而vaccine是一種注入人體的病菌,故選D項。

2.2】 C

解析 細節(jié)理解題。William Schaffner說流感疫苗不像小兒麻痹癥疫苗或麻疹疫苗那么有效,后又說它不是一個效果特別好的疫苗,但是效果還不錯,也就是說多多少少對疾病會有幫助。

3.3】 B

解析 推理判斷題。文章第三段說流感疫苗就像天氣預報那樣,有的時候能對上正在流行的流感類型,有的時候則對不上。第五段第一句又說疫苗不是對每個人都管用,也就是說流感疫苗并不是對每個人都有效。

4.4】 C

解析 細節(jié)理解題。由文章倒數(shù)第二段可知,注射流感疫苗后,人體可能會有反應,比如發(fā)低燒和身體疼痛等,但這些癥狀在一兩天內就可消失。

練習冊系列答案
相關習題

科目:高中英語 來源:2013屆江蘇省揚州市高三下學期5月考前適應性考試英語卷(帶解析) 題型:單選題

--- Which hotel did you stay in last week?
--- Well, just the one _______I think you once met Ge You and his family.

A.thatB.whichC.whereD.a(chǎn)s

查看答案和解析>>

科目:高中英語 來源:2012-2013學年江蘇省揚州市高三下學期5月考前適應性考試英語卷(解析版) 題型:單項填空

--- Which hotel did you stay in last week?

--- Well, just the one _______I think you once met Ge You and his family.

A.that              B.which            C.where            D.a(chǎn)s

 

查看答案和解析>>

科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:單選題

--- Which hotel did you stay in last week?
--- Well, just the one _______I think you once met Ge You and his family.


  1. A.
    that
  2. B.
    which
  3. C.
    where
  4. D.
    as

查看答案和解析>>

科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:閱讀理解

You Are What You Eat

      Genetic engineering is the scientific change of the genetic material in a living organism. It allows scientists to identify specific genes, to remove them from an organism's chromosomes (染色體), improve them, analyze them, and possibly clone them, and to then reinsert the changed gene into the original organism, or a completely different organism.Unlike traditional breeding, where a desired quality would be bred within the same species, genetic engineering can insert desired ones into organisms of different species. Wow…Did you catch that?

     Genetic engineering creates many positive contributions to agriculture. For example, by genetically engineered(GE)foods, anti-cancer agents, minerals and vitamins can be increased. Improved taste, shelf life, and better transport are all possible. Also, GE plants can increase pest and bacterial resistance, therefore, making the food safe for consumers.

    But some argue that the possible negative effects outweigh the positives, and critics are starting to voice their concerns. Unlike Europe, in the United States labeling is not required on genetically engineered foods or on foods that contain genetically engineered products. Most Americans do not realize that they are, in fact, eating GE foods.

    The public is also concerned about the unknown health risks. With limited understanding of genes, scientists cannot predict possible effects. Because most genes introduced into GE plants come from sources not introduced into the human body, it is impossible to know if they will cause reactions. Moreover, due to the lack of labeling if allergies develop, it will be extremely difficult to find the origin of them.

    There is also a major moral question in many minds. For many, the conflict is not if it is safe or not, but it disturbs them because it is unnatural and unnecessary. We are currently producing one and a half times the amount of food needed to feed the world, yet one in seven people are starving. GE food is unnecessary, and fails to address the root of hunger. Many believe that the only people who will benefit are the corporations that produce it.

    Scientists cannot foresee the possible effects of GE foods, but we eat them every day without even knowing it. We already have enough food, so why create more that could be potentially harmful to us, to the Earth and to all wildlife? I think that the benefits are amazing, but until we know for sure how these foods will affect us, they are not worth the risk.

63. According to the passage, traditional breeding is different from genetic engineering in that_____.

A. traditional breeding changes the genes in the same species

B. traditional breeding changes the genes in different species

C. traditional breeding takes place within the same species

D. traditional breeding is more scientific

64. “The lack of labeling” in Paragraph 4 indicates_________.

A. information concerning gene sources is unavailable to customers

B. it is currently possible to find the origins of some allergies

C. scientists try to hide potential dangers from customers

D. the US government is responsible for GE food

65. According to Paragraph 5, GE food is unnecessary because________.

A. it won't help solve the problem of hunger in the world

B. there are potential dangers in producing GE food

C. we're now producing more food than before

D. customers will benefit from GE food

66. What is the author's attitude towards genetic engineering?

      A. Welcoming             B. Disapproving          C. Unconcerned          D. Optimistic

查看答案和解析>>

同步練習冊答案