Question

 

A few years ago I had an “aha!” moment regarding handwriting.

I had in my hand a sheet of paper with handwritten instructions on it for some sort of editorial task. It occurred at first that I did not recognize the handwriting，and then I realized whose it must be. I finally became aware of the fact that I had been working with this colleague for at least a year，maybe two，and yet I did not recognize her handwriting at that point.

It was a very important event in the computerization of life—a sign that the informal. Friendly communication of people working together in an office had changed from notes in pen to instant messages and emails. There was a time when our workdays were filled with little letters，and we recognized one another's handwriting the way we knew voices or faces.

As a child visiting my father’s office，1 was pleased to recognize，in little notes on the desks of his staff，the same handwriting 1 would see at home in the notes he would leave on the fridge—except that those notes were signed “dad” instead of “RFW”.

All this has been on my mind because of the talk about The Rise and Fall of Handwriting，a book by Florey. Sire shows in her book a deep concern about the fall of handwriting and the failure of schools to teach children to write well，but many others argue that people in a digital age can’t be expected to learn to hold a pen.

I don’t buy it.

I don’t want to see anyone cut off from the expressive，personal associations that a pen still promotes better than a digital keyboard does. For many a biographer，part of really getting to know their subjects is learning to read their handwriting.

What some people advocate is teaching one of the many attractive handwritings based on the handwriting of 16^th-century Italy. That may sound impossibly grand—as if they want kids to learn to draw by copying classical paintings. However，they have worked in many school systems.

1.Why was the author surprised at not recognizing his colleague’s handwriting?

A. He had worked with his colleague long enough.

B. His colleague’s handwriting was SO beautiful.

C. His colleague’s handwriting was SO terrible.

D. He still had a 1ot of Work to do.

2.People working together in an office used to ____________.

A. talk more about handwriting

B. take more notes on workdays

C. know better one another's handwriting

D. communicate better with one another

3.The author’s father wrote notes in pen _________.

A. to both his family and his staff

B. to his family in small letters

C. to his family on the fridge

D. to his staff on the desk

4.According to the author，handwritten notes _______.

A. are harder to teach in schools

B. attract more attention

C. are used only between friends

D. carry more message

5.We can learn from the passage that the author __________.

A. thinks it impossible to teach handwriting

B. does not want to lose handwriting

C. puts the blame on the computer

D. does not agree with Florey

本文是一篇夾敘夾議的文章，通過(guò)一時(shí)辨認(rèn)不出一位老同事的字跡及其回顧，對(duì)在電腦沖擊下，書(shū)法受忽視感到惋惜，并認(rèn)為中小學(xué)應(yīng)當(dāng)加強(qiáng)書(shū)法教學(xué)。

 

Answer 1

【答案】

1.A。

【解析】細(xì)節(jié)理解題。由第二段最后一句I had been working with this colleague for at least a year, maybe two, and yet I did not recognize her handwriting可知。

2.C

【解析】由第三段“There was a time when our workdays were filled with little letters, and we recognized one another’s handwriting the way we knew voices or faces”可知

3.A。

【解析】細(xì)節(jié)理解題。由第四段I was pleased to recognize… his staff…the same I would see at home…可知。

4.D。

【解析】推理判斷題。由倒數(shù)第二段第一句the expressive, personal associations that a pen still promotes better than a digital keyboard does可知。

5.B。

【解析】推理判斷題。由最后一段可推知。

【材料來(lái)源】http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-195935183.html

本文是一篇夾敘夾議的文章，通過(guò)一時(shí)辨認(rèn)不出一位老同事的字跡及其回顧，對(duì)在電腦沖擊下，書(shū)法受忽視感到惋惜，并認(rèn)為中小學(xué)應(yīng)當(dāng)加強(qiáng)書(shū)法教學(xué)。

本文是一篇夾敘夾議的文章，通過(guò)一時(shí)辨認(rèn)不出一位老同事的字跡及其回顧，對(duì)在電腦沖擊下，書(shū)法受忽視感到惋惜，并認(rèn)為中小學(xué)應(yīng)當(dāng)加強(qiáng)書(shū)法教學(xué)。