That man kept quiet about the accident ________ lose his job. A. so not as to B. so as not to C. so as to not D. not so as to |
科目:高中英語 來源:活題巧解巧練·高二英語·下 題型:050
閱讀理解
Many experts complain that media (傳媒) too often take advantage of the science fiction (科幻小說) aspects of nanotech (納米技術(shù)) . Reports of nanotech often refer to K. Eric Drexler's book Engines of Creations , which predicts an age full of dominant molecular(分子的) manufacturing and a world without material scarcity (短缺) . Whatever humans need will one day be built cheaply with microscopic self-replicating machines (精微自我復(fù)制機) , that put atoms together to create copies of anything alive in the world-from trees to human bodies.
In fact, the scientific community is deeply divided over whether self-replicating machines ere possible. If they are, major dangers could exist. Dr. Drexler himself thought that self-replicating machines could go out of control . He writes in his book that man-made “plants” with leaves no more efficient than today's solar cells could win over real plants crowding the earth with leaves that are not suitable to be eaten. Tough “bacteria (細(xì)菌)” could be more competitive than the real bacteria. They could spread everywhere, replicate swiftly, and reduce the earth to dust in a matter of days.
Critics of nanotech have made use of such images, calling for a delay on commercial (商業(yè)的) nanotech until regulations (法規(guī)) are established. They also point to the possible military uses of nanotech. Bill Jay , the co-founder of Sun Microsystems, wrote in a Wired magazine essay in 2000 that if nanotech falls into the wrong hands, it could bring dangers to society.
Opponents say Mr. Joy is over-reacting, “In a way, calling for bans on research into molecular manufacturing is like calling for a delay on faster than-light travel because no one is dong it. ” says Glenn Reynolds, a University of Tennessee law professor.
Professor Reynolds says it is a good idea to regulate nanotech, but in ways the government would regulate any that could be dangerous. Expert controls and certification systems for nanotech companies are examples. US lawmakers have put forth four bills (法案) on nanotech research and development.
1.K. Eric Drexler in his book predicts a future world with sufficient material, because ________.
[ ]
A.man-made plants could replace real plants and grow more quickly
B.plants produced by nanotech would be as sufficient as today's solar
C.man-made bacteria would be wide-spread and capable of self-replicating
D.humans could create copies of anything alive with high technology
2.To call far a delay on commercial nanotech, critics of nanotech make use of ________.
[ ]
A.current social problems
B.science fiction descriptions
C.disagreements in the scientific community
D.the fact that no one is doing molecular manufacturing
3.Opponents of Bill Joy would NOT agree to ________.
[ ]
A.control nanotech expert
B.ban nanotech research to avoid any possible dangers
C.put forth bills on nanotech research and development
D.establish a certification system for nanotech companies
4.Which of the following is the main idea of the passage?
[ ]
A.Nanotech should not be put into wrong use in the military field.
B.The government should regulate products that could be dangerous.
C.Nanotech regulations should be established in spite of the divided opinions.
D.The media should not take advantage of the science fiction aspects of nanotech.
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:2004全國各省市高考模擬試題匯編(天利38套)·英語 題型:050
Reading Comprehension
Many experts complain that media too often take advantage of the science fiction aspects of nanotech (納米技術(shù)). Reports of nanotech often refer to K. Eric Drexler's book Engines of Creations, which predicts an age full of dominant molecular (分子的) manufacturing and world without material scarcity. Whatever humans need will one day be built cheaply with microscopic self-replicating machines (微細(xì)自我復(fù)制機)that put atoms together to create copies of anything alive in the worldfrom trees to human bodies.
In fact, the scientific community is deeply divided over whether self-replicating machines are possible. If they are, major dangers could east. Mr. Drexler himself thought that self-replicating machines could probably go out of control. He writes in his book that man-made “plants” with “l(fā)eaves no more efficient than today's solar cells could win over real plants, crowding the earth with leaves that are not suitable to be eaten. Tough ‘bacteria’ could be more competitive than the real bacteria: They could spread everywhere, replicate swiftly, and reduce the earth to dust in a matter of days.”
Critics of nanotech have made use of such images, calling for a delay on commercial nanotech until regulations are established. They also point to the possible military uses of nanotech. Bill Joy, the co-founder of Sun Microsystems, wrote in a Wired magazine essay in 2000 that if nanotech falls into the wrong hands, it could bring dangers to society.
Opponents say Mr. Joy is overreacting. “In a way, calling for bans on research into molecular manufacturing is like calling for a delay on faster-than-light travel because no one is doing it,” says Glenn Reynolds, a University of Tennessee law professor.
Professor Reynolds says it is a good idea to regulate nanotech, but in ways the government would regulate any products that could be dangerous. Export controls and certification systems for nanotech companies are examples. US lawmakers have put forth four bills on nanotech research and development.
1.K. Eric Drexler in his book predicts a future world with sufficient material, because
[ ]
A.man-made plants could replace real plants and grow more quickly
B.plants produced by nanotech would be as efficient as today's solar cells
C.man-made bacteria would be widespread and capable of self-replicating
D.humans could create copies of anything alive with high technology
2.To call for a delay on commercial nanotech, critics of nanotech make use of
[ ]
A.current social problems
B.science fiction descriptions
C.disagreements in the scientific community
D.the fact that no one is doing molecular manufacturing
3.Opponents of Bill Joy would NOT agree to
[ ]
A.control nanotech export
B.ban nanotech research to avoid any possible dangers
C.put forth bills on nanotech research and development
D.establish a certification system for nanotech companies
4.Which of the following statements best summarizes the main idea of the passage?
[ ]
A.Nanotech should not be put into wrong use in the military field.
B.The government should regulare products that could be dangerous.
C.Nanotech regulations should be established in spite of the divided opinions.
D.The media should not take advantage of the science fiction aspects of nanotech.
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:讀想用 高二英語(下) 題型:050
閱讀理解
Many experts complain that media too often take advantage of the science fiction aspects of nanotech(納米技術(shù)).Reports of nanotech often refer to K.Eric Drexler's book Engines of creations,which predicts an age full of dominant molecular(分子的)manufacturing and a world without material scarcity.whatever humans need will one day be built cheaply with microscopic self-replicating machines(微細(xì)自我復(fù)制機)that put atoms together to create copies of anything alive in the world-from trees to human bodies.
In fact,the scientific community is deeply divided over whether self-replicating machines are possible.If they are,major dangers could exist.Mr.Drexler himself thought that self-replicating machines could probably go out of control.He writes in his book that man-made “plants”with“l(fā)eaves no more efficient than today's solar cells could win over real plants,crowding the earth with leaves that are not suitable to be eaten.Tough‘bacteria'could be more competitive than the real bacteria:they could spread everywhere,replicate swiftly,and reduce the earth to dust in a matter of days.”
Critics of nanotech have made use of such images,calling for a delay on commercial nanotech until regulations are established.They also point to the possible military uses of nanotech.Bill Joy,the cofounder of Sun Microsystems,wrote a Wired magazine essay in 2000 that if nanotech falls into the wrong hands,it could bring danger to society.
Opponents say Mr.Joy is overreacting.“ In a way,calling for bans on research into molecular manufacturing is like calling for delay on faster-than-light travel because no one is doing it,”says Glenn Reynolds,a University of Tennessee law professor.
Professor Reynolds says it is a good idea to regulate nanotech,but in ways the government would regulate any products that could be dangerous.Export controls and certification systems for nanotech companies are examples.US lawmakers have put forth four bills on nanotech research and development.
1.Eric Drexler in his book predicts a future world with sufficient material,because________.
[ ]
A.man-made plants could replace real plants and grow more quickly
B.plants produced by nanotech would be as efficient as today's solar cells
C.man-made bacteria would be widespread and capable of self-replicating
D.humans could create copies of anything alive with high technology
2.To call for a delay of commercial nanotech,critics of nanotech make use of________.
[ ]
A.current social problems
B.science fiction descriptions
C.disagreements in the scientific community
D.he fact that no one is doing molecular manufacturing
3.Opponents of Bill Joy would NOT agree to________.
[ ]
A.control nanotech export
B.ban nanotech research to avoid any possible dangers
C.put forth bills on nanotech research and development
D.establish a certification system for nanotech companies
4.Which of the following statements best summarizes the main idea of the passage?
[ ]
A.Nanotech should not be put into wrong use in the military field
B.The government should regulate products that could be dangerous
C.Nanotech regulations should be established in spite of the divided opinions
D.The media should not take advantage of the science fiction aspects of nanotech.
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:河南省示范性高中五校2010屆高三模擬聯(lián)考(英語) 題型:閱讀理解
The poor are very wonderful people. One evening we went out and we picked up four people from the street. And one of them was in a most terrible condition-and I told the sisters: You take care of the other three. I take care of this one who looked worse. So I did for her all that my love can do. I put her in bed, and there was such a beautiful smile on her face. She took hold of my hand as she said just the words “Thank you” and she died.
I could not help but examine my conscience before her and I asked what I would say if I was in her place. And my answer was very simple. I would have tried to draw a little attention to myself. I would have said I am hungry, that I am dying, I am cold, I am in pain, or something, but she gave me much more-she gave me her grateful love. And she died with a smile on her face. So did that man whom we picked up from the drain, half eaten with worms, and we brought him to the home. “I have lived like an animal in the street, but I am going to die like an angel, loved and cared for”,he said at the end . And it was so wonderful to see the greatness of that man who could speak like that, who could die like that without blaming anybody, without cursing anybody, without comparing anything. Like an angel-this is the greatness of our people. And that is why we believe what Jesus has said: I was hungry, I was naked, I was homeless, I was unwanted, unloved, uncared for, and you did it to me.
And with this prize that I received as a Prize of Peace, I am going to try to make the home for many people who have no home. Because I believe that love begins at home and if we can create a home for the poor I think that more and more love will spread. And we will be able through this understanding love to bring peace, be the good k*s#5^unews to the poor, the poor in our own family first, in our country and in the world. When I pick up a person from the street, hungry, I give him a plate of rice, a piece of bread, I have satisfied. I have removed that hunger. But to a person who is shut out, who feels unwanted, unloved, terrified, the person who has been thrown out from society, that poverty is so full of hurt and so unbearable… And so let us always meet each other with a smile, for the smile is the beginning of love, and once we begin to love each other naturally we want to do something.
56. What can be learned from the second paragraph?
A. The woman should have paid more attention to herself.
B. The man couldn’t blame anyone.
C. The author is religious.
D. The man died in the street.
57. The purpose of this passage is .
A. To appeal for more donation for the poor.
B. To call on the public to love each other.
C. To tell the readers the poor are wonderful.
D. To express how moved the author is to receive the prize.
58. is NOT inferred from the passage?
A. The author has few supporters.
B. The author was somewhat surprised at what the man said.
C. The author is delighted to help others in trouble.
D. The author may agree to solve social problems in soft ways.
59. What’s the best title of this passage?
A. Have Sympathy for the Poor
B. The Poor are Wonderful
C. Smile and Love
D. Relieve Poverty
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:上海高考真題 題型:閱讀理解
查看答案和解析>>
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 涉企侵權(quán)舉報專區(qū)
違法和不良信息舉報電話:027-86699610 舉報郵箱:58377363@163.com